سلام دوستان عزیز میشه لطف کنید کمکم کنید این متن تخصصی رشته مدیریت را ترجمه تخصصی کنید..ممنونم

Democracies worldwide are confronted with the rise of
populist movements (Mansbridge & Macedo, 2019;
Moffitt, 2016; Urbinati, 2019). While populists in opposi­
tion might be a force of democratic rejuvenation as they
bring into the political arena concerns that have been
ignored or suppressed (Kazin, 2017; Mudde & Rovira
Kaltwasser, 2017; Müller, 2016; Urbinati, 2014), there is
little doubt that where populists conquer executive power,
they pose a danger to the survival of the liberal character of
democratic systems (Askim et al., 2022; Bartha et al., 2020).
The increasing number of populists in government
has also put the spotlight on the public bureaucracies of
the affected states (Arellano-Gault, 2020; Green, 2019;
Rockman, 2019) because no government, not even of
the most elite-bashing anti-establishment kind, can gov­
ern without relying on (at least parts of) the existing
bureaucratic machinery (Bauer & Becker, 2020; Finer,
1997). Moreover, while the state bureaucracy is needed
to implement their agendas, populists in government
regularly dismantle the liberal features of their admin­
istration systems to secure their grip on power (Bauer,
Peters, & Pierre, 2021). Under the rule of populists, the
bureaucracy is thus tool and victim of democratic back­
sliding at one and the same time. This is the reason why
the rise of populism has sparked a debate within the
(PA) about what
happens to public administrations when populists come
to power, and what can be expected from a democratic
civil service to safeguard the liberal democratic order
from being undermined from within or even totally over­
thrown (Peters & Pierre, 2019; Yesilkagit, 2021).
So far PA research has centered on identifying populist
strategies aiming at reforming the civil service – most of
the time by renouncing liberal values, strengthening hier­
archy and excessively politicizing recruitment and career
advancement (Bauer & Becker, 2020; Bauer, Peters, &
Pierre, 2021) – as well as on the ability and responsibility
of public officials to react to the populist threat of under­
mining democratic procedures, standards, and structures
(Box, 2021; Guedes-Neto & Peters, 2021; Moynihan, 2022;
O’Leary, 2017; Schuster et al., 2022). The hopes and doubts
of whether the bureaucracy can do more, i.e., assume a role
of an active guardian of democracy, find expression in
recent publications about whether “the bureaucracy can
save liberal democracy” (Yesilkagit, 2021), whether
“democracy can be strengthened through public adminis­
tration” (Box, 2017; Goodsell, 2022) and how “pathways to
administrative resilience” in face of illiberal tribulations
(Bauer, Peters, & Pierre, 2021) might look.
Against this background, this article aims to advance
the debate about the populist threat of transforming
democratic administrative systems according to an